
4. And oh yeah, how about Sean Fucking Hannity? Has he wussed out of his own promised waterboarding, or has he gone ahead with it after all? Anybody know?
5. John Fucking Yoo. Another one who really needs to shut the fuck up and go the hell away, because he’s done enough
6. John Fucking Hawkins. Dumbest fucking twit on Twitter? Could be. What say we waterboard him against his will to show him that yes, it IS torture?7. William Fucking Brennan. Maybe he needs some time on a waterboard next to John Fucking Hawkins; it seems that nothing less than harsh experience will convince them that the technique IS torture.8. David Fucking Riley. Just because some military members underwent waterboarding during training, doesn’t mean it’s not torture. And if “only” three people were tortured by interrogators, that’s still three too many. For what information? Well, David, check it out for yourself right here. Then you can tell the good folks at Firedoglake if it’s “actionable intelligence” or not. What it all makes no difference to is the plain and simple fact that it’s barbaric, and that those who use it have no business calling themselves free and democratic, no matter how many or how few times they’ve used it in the name of freedom and democracy. The point is that no free democrat uses it at all.9. Bryan Fucking Whitman. Sorry, but the UK Telegraph is right–there ARE pictures of sexual abuse taking place at Abu Ghraib, and some of them can be seen right here. In fact, this story isn’t even new. I’ve known about these rape accounts since 2004, when they started coming out in the media! Pentagon spokesmen lie! Gosh, who knew?And finally, anyone else out there who thinks that waterboarding (a) isn’t torture, (b) saves lives, (c) can defuse a ticking time bomb, or (d) is just what those ragheads need to bring them around to the Amurrican Way. I have an inclined board with a few restraining straps, an old rag, and a bucket of water with your name on it, punk-ass.
Or maybe not.
Globovisión, Venezuela’s equivalent of FUX Snooze, has been a news item in itself for the past few weeks, and for all the wrong reasons. Here’s one of them: Video in Spanish, but the pictures speak for themselves. Watch the chick with the blond bob, the little hand-held camera, and the bared teeth. Aggressive, isn’t she? Her name is Beatriz Adrián, and she’s supposed to be a journalist. But it seems that her real job is that of agent provocateur (or should that be agente provocateuse?) in the ongoing, futile and dirty fight by the ancien régime of Venezuela–now the opposition–to oust a popular, freely and democratically elected president.So how is she a provoc? Well, a few months ago, she claimed to have been harrassed by Chavista goons at a bakeshop where she and a friend went to breakfast one day. Turns out, the “Chavista harassers” were nothing of the sort; they were private security men on the job at the shop, and they didn’t touch her. But she squeaked, and she squawked, and her “report” made the news on her channel, where everyone rallied around poor, brave, beleaguered Beatriz–at least until Mario Silva dissected the whole story on his VTV show, La Hojilla, and proved it to be more full of holes than a strip of Brussels lace. The defamed men, meanwhile, went to the authorities with their side of the story. (If you click on the link, you’ll immediately see what was really at play–the guys she complained about are kind of non-white.)More recently, Beatriz thought she’d scored a journalistic coup by bribing a National Assembly staffer to hand over some confidential documents. The staffer lost her job; Beatriz, again, got the kind of media exposure she hadn’t counted on when the building’s security cameras caught the whole shebang. But unlike the luckless lady from the National Assembly, she got to keep her job. After all, Globovisión needed her…Which brings us to the videos above. Beatriz Adrián, apparently, has gone from phony “victim” of private security to taking the job on herself. When a VTV reporter, Erika Ortega Sanoja, tried to ask some questions of poor deluded old Mario Vargas Llosa, who was in country to make an ass of himself at a “forum” supporting the putschy ancien régime in the name of “freedom and democracy” (and who, incidentally, was NOT “detained” by security at any time–more on this later), Beatriz took exception to Erika’s questioning, and repeatedly pushed and shoved her. At one point, witnesses say, she hit Erika on the head with her microphone; the latter ended up seeking first aid at the airport’s infirmary, and reported the assault to the civil defence officer on duty. Beatriz Adrián, however, exhibited only rudeness and defiance throughout the encounter. She notably asked NO questions of Vargas Llosa herself, which is a very unjournalistic sort of thing to do. Instead, she kept spinning around, snarling, taking pictures of everyone around her, as if gathering evidence that she had been the victim of aggression–interesting, since the video cameras of more than one channel, including her own, caught her being very much the aggressor. At several points, she launched herself at other journalists present, including a cameraman for the Caracas community channel, Avila TV. (She missed. Kind of a metaphor, don’tcha think?)By now you might be wondering why all this journalistic own-goaling is happening. Well, Globovisión is slipping closer and closer to the edge of having its licence revoked. As I’ve noted before, this sort of thing happens all the time in democracies when a broadcaster violates the terms of use for the public airwaves. But in Venezuela it isn’t supposed to happen, and certainly not to overtly right-wing channels looking to overthrow a democratically elected government. Especially not if the owners of the channel also happen to own other highly lucrative things–such as, in the case of Globo’s Guillermo Zuloaga, two Toyota dealerships recently busted for jacking up the price of the merchandise two- and threefold, thus ripping off the car-buying public. But again, that’s grist for another story. Perhaps I’ll make the entry about how this sort of price-gouging is emblematic of the “freedom and democracy” that Mario Vargas Llosa came so touchingly to defend, at great risk to the security of his person…from self-appointed guards like Beatriz Adrián.Such poor victims, the whole lot of them–piss-poor victims, that is.Evo played soccer outside the presidential palace in La Paz yesterday, but something is wrong with this picture:
HE’S NOT WEARING SHORTS!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!Damn.
“Sir, ‘I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it’ was said not by a Frenchman but by an Englishwoman; it is not a genuine quotation from Voltaire but an imaginary one claiming to express ‘his attitude’ in The Friends of Voltaire (1906) by S. G. Tallentyre, the pseudonym of E. Beatrice Hall. In fact this was not his attitude; although he took a great part in the struggle for toleration, he also took great care not to risk his liberty, let alone his life, for the cause: no wonder, considering the treatment he suffered for careless talk in his youth, and the treatment so many of his writings suffered at all times.“It would be better not to attribute to Voltaire a rhetorical statement he never made, and to remember instead the practical things he actually said (in the Treatise on Toleration and the Philosophical Dictionary) and did (in particular cases and in the general campaign) to crush the infamy of intolerance and to make it possible for us to take the freedom of speech for granted.”–Jean Raison, letter to the Times of London, August 8, 1981
(‘Bina’s note: Are they sure that’s an Englishwoman, and not a Frenchman whose name, in English, would be “John Reason”? In any event, what a relief not to have to defend fascist speech to the death, but rather to FIGHT it to the death in the original spirit of “écraser l’infâme”!)A couple of FAO Schwartz employees show off their mad organ skillz:
The tune is the “Toccata and Fugue in D Minor” by Johann Sebastian Bach.
The president of the Inter-American Press Association (IAPA), Enrique Santos of Colombia, certified on Wednesday, during a meeting with President Evo Morales in the Quemado Palace in La Paz, Bolivia, that in Bolivia there is freedom of the press.“What we were able to determine is that in Bolivia, press freedom exists,” said Santos, who also represents the newspaper El Tiempo of Bogotá. “From all one can see, hear and read, it can’t be said that here there is no opposition press, that there are no criticisms of the government,” said Santos.The head of the IAPA, which brings together 1300 private media outlets of the Americas, underscored that “it is important for me to say this clearly.”Translation mine. Holy shit, a Colombian commercial media type says there’s no censorship, no oppression, and a loud, critical oppo media mafia? Well, we already knew THAT. Nice to see him confirm it, eh?But wait, there’s more:
Santos and four delegates of the IAPA were invited by Morales. The president showed them a series of proofs, in audio and video, concerning the least-biased treatment of information by the IAPA’s affiliates in Bolivia. Presidential spokesman Iván Canelas demonstrated one by one the cases, principally in newspapers and television, in which the information was “manipulated”, in order to steer public opinion against the policies of the Morales government.Canelas laid out, among dozens of cases, an unfounded accusation which the newspaper, La Prensa, made against Morales last December, which is currently before the courts.The Minister of the Presidency, Juan Ramón Quintana, also exposed before the commission of the IAPA the economic links between the private media and the ex-prefect, Leopoldo Fernández, in the Amazonian department of Pando. Fernández currently faces charges in the murders of 18 campesinos in September 2008.For those who’ve been paying attention, that last one is no news. El Duderino has some good details here. But now, at least, Evo’s getting a chance to respond, and to take up his concerns with the IAPA personally–something that the oppo presstitutes themselves were not willing to grant him. But the real shocker comes just before the end of the piece:
After the series of expositions by Canelas, Quintana and the vice-minister of the Presidency, Sacha Llorenti, the second vice-president of the IAPA, Gonzalo Marroquín, said that “the IAPA never defends acts of corruption”. “We believe that they should be denounced” and brought to justice, Marroquín said. He also characterized as “positive” the co-operation of Morales “in the area of tolerance”.Santos added to this a remark that “the media who lie are digging their own grave.”Well. That was the blindingly obvious. Now here comes the prize, kiddies…
Congratulations, IAPA bigwigs. It looks as though you’re finally coming of age as journalists: hearing both sides of the story, sorting out the lies, telling the truth, and being fair and honest to those who, no doubt, make you grit your teeth. At this rate, you might even become fit to report real news eventually!

Venezuela and Bolivia are supplying Iran with uranium for its nuclear program, according to a secret Israeli government report obtained Monday by The Associated Press.The two South American countries are known to have close ties with Iran, but this is the first allegation that they are involved in the development of Iran’s nuclear program, considered a strategic threat by Israel.“There are reports that Venezuela supplies Iran with uranium for its nuclear program,” the Foreign Ministry document states, referring to previous Israeli intelligence conclusions. It added, “Bolivia also supplies uranium to Iran.”The report concludes that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is trying to undermine the United States by supporting Iran.Venezuela and Bolivia are close allies, and both regimes have a history of opposing U.S. foreign policy and Israeli actions. Venezuela expelled the Israeli ambassador during Israel’s offensive in Gaza this year, and Israel retaliated by expelling the Venezuelan envoy. Bolivia cut ties with Israel over the offensive.There was no immediate comment from officials in Venezuela or Bolivia on the report’s allegations.
Funny, but Bolivia DOES have something to say, and I hereby translate for the benefit of the Israelis–and their Dissociated Press pals:The minister of the Presidency of Bolivia, Juan Ramón Quintana, called the supposed secret information that Bolivia and Venezuela are supplying uranium to the Iranian government, a “clownish farce”. “Only a clown would let such barbarities happen. Since it’s so, it must be said that a certain Israeli agency is an agency of inepts, incompetents, and clowns,” said Quintana during a press conference at the government palace. [...]Quintana said that the supposed denunciation “is part of the anthology of stupidity” because if anything characterizes the politics of the Bolivian government, “it is the politics of international peace.”“The principles which guide our constitution are set out most clearly–to promote a culture of understanding between peoples, and to improve integration. The Bolivian constitution clearly expresses our renunciation of war.”Uh, Houston? I believe we have a bitch slap.But wait, it gets even funnier. According to that very same Dissociated Press piece,
Bolivia has uranium deposits. Venezuela is not currently mining its own estimated 50,000 tons of untapped uranium reserves, according to an analysis published in December by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The Carnegie report said, however, that recent collaboration with Iran in strategic minerals has generated speculation that Venezuela could mine uranium for Iran.Charmed. Does this remind anyone of anything?
Yep, kiddies, that’s right…the Carnegie Endowment thinks Venezuela and Bolivia are committing pre-crime…by NOT EVEN TAPPING their uranium deposits, much less selling any to Iran. Next up: Venezuela and Bolivia found guilty (God only knows how!) of selling some to Kim Jong Mentally Il…thereby resulting in this week’s 4.7 magnitude nuclear squib.Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to go disarm my head. It feels like it’s about to go up in a mushroom cloud from all this stupidity.UPDATE: The Old Grey Whore has a “brief” from the Dissociated Press, noting that Venezuela and Bolivia have “ridiculed” the “report”. They’re only a day late, and their coverage leaves, as usual, much to be desired. Guess that bit about being a clown was so horrifying that they couldn’t reprint it. Good thing you got me, eh kiddies?