Radical breast cancer preventive surgery common in Brazil

rita-lee

Brazilian pop star Rita Lee knows what Angelina Jolie is going through; she’s been through it herself. And so have many other Brazilian women:

Actress Angelina Jolie caused a great sensation on Tuesday when she announced that she had undergone a double mastectomy to prevent breast cancer. But the procedure is common in Brazil as well. In 2010, singer Rita Lee had her breasts removed, on the advice of her gynecologist. Her mother had died of cancer, and the risk of developing the disease was very high.

“My gynecologist advised me to have my breasts removed, which didn’t make much difference, since mine were already small,” said the singer, interviewed by Istoé magazine, in September 2010. “I prefer to be without breasts and at peace, rather than still have them and be paranoid,” said Lee, who decided not to have reconstruction surgery.

Plastic surgeon and breast specialist João Carlos Sampaio, director of the Brazilian Institute for Cancer Control, said that he performs at least one preventive or prophylactic surgery a week. According to the specialist, the number of such interventions has grown in recent years, as a result of improved surgical techniques and of early diagnostic procedures.

“I recommend it. The result is the same as a breast enlargement,” Sampaio explained, stressing that the scar would be quite small. Before, the patients would ponder more, with fear of suffering some type of mutilation or for esthetic reasons.

João Carlos Sampaio says that he knows of other cases of famous women, including patients of his, who opted to have their breasts removed. He refused to give names for ethical reasons.

Before recommending a preventive surgery for breast cancer, the doctor performs genetic analyses, a genealogy, and pathologic exams to determine if there are pre-cancerous cells. With results in hand, a patent can decide whether to have her breasts removed, take hormone treatments, or only medical follow-ups.

“It’s not obligatory. It’s one option. I always converse with my patients. It’s very important that she understand the risks and the options. Any choice needs to be conscious,” Sampaio emphasizes. “If she has an 87% risk, it’s almost certain that she will have breast cancer,” he says, speaking of the case of Angelina Jolie.

João Carlos Sampaio has developed, and uses in Brazil, a technique more modern than the one used on Angelina Jolie. The actress’s procedure was performed in two phases: first, removal of the breasts, and second, nine weeks later, reconstruction.

Sampaio’s patients have preventive surgery in just one phase. Instead of using an expander, as in Jolie’s case, for weeks, to create space for silicone prostheses, the surgeon lifts the patient’s muscle partially and inserts a type of screen. Then, he implants silicone prostheses and adjusts the size so that the breasts have a natural appearance.

“I was surprised to read that she used the older technique,” Sampaio says, adding that many doctors in the United States use the technique created in Brazil.

The method developed by the Brazilian specialist was published in the 1990s, and has been refined since then.

“I’ve haven’t been using the expander for nearly 20 years. There is no more need for that type of surgery.”

Angelina Jolie’s mother died of cancer at age 56, after nearly a decade of fighting against the disease. The actress had an 87% chance of developing breast cancer, and a 50% chance of contracting ovarian cancer.

Translation mine.

Like Angelina Jolie, Rita Lee lost her mother to breast cancer. Unlike her, she chose not to have reconstruction, as there wasn’t much to rebuild in the first place. Here she is as a teenager in the late 1960s, with her then boyfriend and his brother, as the wildly popular rock-tropicalist trio, Os Mutantes:

Festive Left Friday Blogging: Here, have my earworm.

This has been in my head all day, for reasons understandable if you’ve been reading me lately. Now, let it infiltrate YOUR head:

Oh, you want lyrics too? All righty then:

Working Latin America

The Yankee is afraid that you’ll rise up,
Working Latin America,
I don’t know, why don’t you do it?
The Yankee is afraid of the Revolution,
The Yankee fears the call:
Yankee go home!
Yankee go home…

And rising up over the Amazon,
Comes the rebel cry of the Carioca*,
And comes to unite with his brother,
The Venezuelan worker…

Working Latin America,
Working Latin America,
Latin America…

Lift up in your hands the flag of the Revolution
Working Latin America,
and shout, forcefully:
Yankee go home!
Yankee go home!
Yankee go home!

“Gringo, go home.
The workers of Latin America are telling you:
Gringo, go home!
Yankee go home!”

Lift up in your hands the flag of the Revolution
Working Latin America,
and shout, forcefully:
Yankee go home!
Yankee go home!
Yankee go home!

Translation mine.

*A Carioca is a native of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Since the Brazilian Amazon region borders on Venezuela’s own Amazonas state, there is a geographic connection between the two lands. Alí Primera is making the case for unity between the workers of these two and all other Latin American countries, as well. And I like to think he’d smile if he saw how Chavecito’s election paved the way for Brazil’s Lula and Dilma, who are from the Workers’ Party, and both strong allies of Venezuela…and its workers.

Music for a Sunday: A prayer for Latin America

Maria Bethânia, Caetano Veloso’s sister, puts her unforgettable voice to some powerful lyrics. Here’s my translation:

Grant, my God, grant
That all that separates us
Never bears fruit, never counts
Grant, my God
Grant, my God, grant
That all that binds us
Will be only love of a rare knit
Grant, my God

Grant, my God, grant
That all that separates us
Never bears fruit, never counts
Grant, my God
Grant, my God, grant
That all that binds us
Will be only love of a rare knit
Grant, my God

Grant, my God, grant
That our love will declare itself
Much greater and not stop within us
If the waters of Guanabara
Run down my face
A nation in solidarity won’t stop within us

Grant, my God, grant
A nation in solidarity
Without prejudices, grant
A nation like us

Grant, my God, grant
That our love will declare itself
Much greater and not stop within us
If the waters of Guanabara
Run down my face
A nation in solidarity won’t stop within us

Grant, my God, grant
A nation in solidarity
Without prejudices, grant
A nation like us

A sentiment surely not confined only to Brazil, where this song originates. And by now, that “nation in solidarity” is surely growing throughout Latin America.

Posted in Brazil is the Bomb!, Music for a Sunday. Comments Off »

The “mysterious” death of João Goulart

joao-goulart

It is well known that João Goulart, the popular left-liberal president of Brazil, was overthrown in a military coup that ushered in twenty-one years of fascist military dictatorship, replete with political prisoners (among them, the current president of Brazil, who was a Marxist guerrilla at the time), exiles, murders, tortures and mysterious disappearances. And it’s also well known that he died in exile a dozen years later. But HOW he died has been under dispute ever since. The official version is that he died of cardiac arrest, no doubt despondent over his misfortune, and that was that. But now, we finally see hints that his death, which occurred in the same year that another military coup put generals in charge of Argentina, was no coincidence after all:

For the first time, a Brazilian government has admitted the possibility that the former president, João Goulart, who was deposed by a military coup in 1964, might have been assassinated during his exile in Argentina as part of Operation Condor, the co-ordinated repression by South American dictatorships.

So says the minister of Human Rights for Brazil, Maria do Rosario Nunes, during a public audience of the Truth Commission, which was created by president Dilma Rousseff to investigate the crimes of the military dictatorship (1964-1985).

“There are indications which must not go unrecognized of the responsibility of Operation Condor in something to which we must not close our eyes, which is the very clear possibility that President João Goulart was assassinated,” said the minister of human rights.

Officially, Goulart was declared dead of a heart failure on December 6, 1976, during his exile in the Argentine province of Corrientes, but his family has always maintained that the death had to do with a military conspiracy.

“The case must be investigated in depth,” said Nunes.

The Truth Commission has heightened interest in the mystery surrounding the death of the leftist president Goulart, who was ousted on March 31, 1964, by a military coup.

In 2007 and 2012, a Uruguayan former intelligence agent, Mario Barreiro, said that he had been ordered to spy for four years on Goulart in his exile, and that the Brazilian dictator, Ernesto Geisel, considered Goulart a threat to his reign.

Attorney Rosa Cardoso, a member of the truth commission, affirmed that there is “a conjunction of conclusive indicators” which favor the likelihood of a crime.

Senator Pedro Simon, of the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB), informed that there had never been an autopsy on the body of Goulart.

Translation mine.

Goulart, a “threat to the reign” of a dictator? Certainly. After all, he was only living a little way across the Argentine border; Corrientes is a northern province, largely devoted to agriculture, but also home to a great deal of leftist campesino agitation. Goulart owned land not only there, but in Uruguay as well, where he was agitating as early as 1966 for Brazil’s return to democratic rule. And after the military seized power in Argentina, copying the “success” of the fascists in its big neighbor to the north, that campesino agitation would have increased exponentially…as would “anticommunist” efforts to snuff it out. The presence of a leftist like Goulart, who was popular with Brazilian workers and peasants particularly, would have been intolerable to the junta.

But it wouldn’t do to ship Goulart back to whence he came; the Brazilian generals wouldn’t have that. The reasons could hardly have been clearer: Goulart, the people’s choice, back on home soil, would have spelled mass revolt against a régime the people’s enemies had worked more than a decade to prop up with violence and bloodshed. So Goulart had to be disposed of in some other manner, one that could be passed off as natural causes. (And of course, without any pesky autopsy.)

And since there was plenty of Operation Condor activity afoot in Uruguay too, and Uruguay lay conveniently wedged between Argentina and Brazil, it’s not so far-fetched to assume that the same Uruguayan intelligence agent sent to spy on Goulart for the last four years of his life would have been privy to a thing or two about his death.

In short, a lot of old Condor guano is about to be severely disturbed.

Politest ass-kicking EVER.

pinera-evo

Did I not say a little while back that Evo was pissed at Sebastián Piñera for making promises he had no intention of keeping? And that he got on better with Ollanta Humala? Why yes, I did. And lo and behold, there has been some fallout…much to Chile’s detriment and Peru’s gain:

President Evo Morales confirmed the exclusion of Chile from the inter-oceanic highway project which will begin in Brazil. Yesterday, he stated that he would inaugurate the cross-continental highway in San José de Chiquitos, along with the Brazilian president, Dilma Rousseff. He also announced that the special guest for the occasion would be the president of Peru, Ollanta Humala.

The announcement comes in the midst of a climate of tension between Bolivia and Chile, following the detention of three Bolivian soldiers and over the maritime claim being pressed by the Morales government in international courts.

“We will meet with the sister president of Brazil and talk about a topic that is important to us. We have agreed that on April 5, I hope I’m not mistaken, we will inaugurate the cross-continental highway. Initially, we agreed that this joint ceremony will happen in San José de Chiquitos,” said Morales during a press conference yesterday in Palacio Quemado, La Paz.

In December 2007, President Morales met in La Paz with former presidents Michelle Bachelet of Chile and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil. During this meeting they agreed to to complete, by 2009, a highway of 6,100 kilometres with an investment of $604 million US, to connect the three countries, uniting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

Three years later, President Morales announced that the Chilean president, Sebastián Piñera, would come to Santa Cruz to inaugurate the highway, along with Dilma Rousseff. But now there is no intention of including Chile in the project, since the Chilean ports initially chosen as endpoints of the highway have been bypassed in favor of those of southern Peru.

After ruling Chile out of the project, Morales said that the special invited guest would be Ollanta Humala, since it was decided that the corridor, and the inter-oceanic railroad, would end in Peru’s ports. “Our special guest will be the president of Peru, Ollanta Humala, so that we will go on seeking integration for the benefit of the peoples of this region and especially of Bolivia, Brazil and Peru.”

The government already has a project to reorient the highway, as well as the railroad. Since until now, the corridor stretched from the port of Santo, Brazil, on the Atlantic, to the Chilean ports of Arica and Iquique, they will soon be diverted toward the Peruvian ports of Matarani and Ilo, as announced by vice-president Alvaro García.

Peru granted port facilities and free transit for its exports via the port of Ilo. Evo Morales and [then-president] Alan García signed the accord in 2010.

Along with the international leadership of the government of Evo Morales, social movements in favor of the government decided to go to the United Nations (UN) and the Organization of American States (OAS) to deounce Chile over the situation of the three detained soldiers.

“We’re going to mobilize, not only in our country but at an international level, we are going to appeal directly to the United Nations and the Organization of American States. This case shows the arrogance of Chile and we cannot accept that,” declared Ever Choquehuanca, executive of the Confederation of Interculturals.

The director announced that he would call a meeting of the Unity Pact to decide when to send a delegation to the international organizations.

Juanita Ancieta, executive of the Bartolinas, and Julián Jala, campesino director, backed the decision to go to international organizations to denounce the detention of the soldiers in Chile. The ruling MAS party, in Cochabamba, criticized the “injustice” on the part of the Chilean government.

Translation mine.

You really have to admire the politeness and restraint Evo showed while dealing Tatán such a tremendous ass-kicking. That’s vintage Evo there. The man’s a Scorpio, after all. You cross those guys at your peril. They can put the mother of all beatdowns on you with exquisite good manners, but by gawd, you will FEEL it in the morning.

And thanks to the stupidity and arrogance of their no-good-very-bad president, the Chilean people are feeling it now. The goodwill of the bilateral relations Bolivia and Chile enjoyed when Michelle Bachelet was president of the latter has all been squandered by Tatán and his mafia of assholes and incompetents. The trade and tourism they’re losing by this is going to cost them billions. And it’s not like they couldn’t use the money. Contrary to anything the bizmedia may tell you, Chile’s “economic miracle” is not merely hollow, it’s bogus. The average Chilean is hurting, and Tatán’s mismanagement has only made the pain worse.

And now this.

But hey, there’s no great loss somewhere without a commensurate gain elsewhere, and sure enough, Peru is the gainer. Ollanta and Evo get along very well indeed. And the port cities of southern Peru stand to benefit hugely by it.

It’s an object lesson in how to do bilateralism: You be nice to the other guy, and the other guy will be nice to you. It’s a no-brainer. And thanks to his lack of brains, Tatán Piñera is finding it out the hard way. I feel very sorry for the people of Chile, but not a bit for him. If only he would suffer for it the way they will. That’s the only thing standing between me and a massive cackle of Schadenfreude right now.

Guess who’s joining MERCOSUR!

W00t.

The president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, will ratify on Thursday during the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR) Heads of State Summit that Bolivia wants to join the regional bloc.

The Bolivian minister of communications, Amanda Dávila, informed that Morales would travel to Brasilia, Brazil, where the summit will take place, to express his country’s wish to be a full member of the organism. At the moment, Bolivia is an associate state.

“The meeting in Brasilia is very important, because there, president Evo Morales will thank MERCOSUR for its invitation and secondly, that we wish to join [the bloc],” said Dávila, according to the ABI news agency.

The minister said that Bolivia’s intentions of accepting the invitation “does not mean we will abandon other processes of integration, such as that of the CAN [Community of Andean Nations].”

Dávila explained that the Bolivian announcement is the beginning of a process that will take about a year, during which the legislative assemblies and congresses of the MERCOSUR member states will debate approving Bolivia’s official participation.

President Evo Morales announced the decision to accept the invitation to join MERCOSUR two weeks ago.

In a speech he listed the reasons for joining the bloc: MERCOSUR “does not have a free trade agreement with the United States”, and within the bloc “there is a productive complementation, a politics of complementarity, not competitiveness.”

He also emphasized that “MERCOSUR is a market much larger than the Andean Community; the Gross Internal Product of the CAN is $279 million, whereas that of Mercosur is $1.932 billion.”

At present, MERCOSUR consists of Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Venezuela and Paraguay; the last is suspended as of last June, since the coup d’état against president Fernando Lugo.

Translation mine.

Apparently the formal invitation for Bolivia to join MERCOSUR went out in November. Nobody told me nothin’. I just translate ‘em, folks.

But seriously: This is great news. It’s a formal recognition that Bolivia is on the up-and-up. For a large common market like MERCOSUR to consider Bolivia worth including means Evo is doing something right. And sure enough, the Bolivian economy is flourishing. Even without a free-trade agreement with the US, they’re holding their own. And no DEA, either. How ’bout them apples, Gringolandia?

Music for a Sunday: Sadness made a samba

There are plenty of good covers of this bossa nova classic by Carlos Lyra and Ronaldo Bôscoli, including the one by Marissa (on the Putumayo Brazilian Lounge CD). The lyrics go as follows:

Let my samba know everything without you;
I don’t believe my samba depends on you alone.
The pain is mine, it hurts inside me
The fault is yours, the samba is mine
So let’s not fight anymore –
Sadness made a samba in your stead.

Translation mine.

Caetano Veloso rocks it up a bit, as he’s done with so many of the greats, but keeps the laid-back bossa mood intact. After all, this is a song about saudade — a Brazilian-Portuguese word that has no exact English translation, but that can mean a variety of related things: here, I went with sadness, but more specifically it’s the blues, yearning, a nostalgic longing for a loved one who’s no longer there, or even looking hopefully forward to seeing that someone again, though with no guarantee of it actually happening. It’s a feeling that pervades a great many bossas.

Posted in Brazil is the Bomb!, Music for a Sunday. Comments Off »

Venezuela enters Mercosur

It’s now official, and here’s the group photo to prove it:

Chavecito joins presidents Dilma Rousseff (Brazil), Pepe Mujica (Uruguay), and Cristina Fernández (Argentina).

And in case you’re wondering how the biggest country in that market bloc feels about this, here you go:

This poster called for a big, huge demo saluting Chávez in front of the Brazilian government palace, the Itamaraty, today. There is no doubt he got it.

Festive Left Friday Blogging: Does he look like he’s dying to you?

Check out the length of this video of Chavecito giving a political speech in Barcelona, Venezuela today:

It goes on for over two hours, and he never falters. A man who’s on his last legs, as some know-nothings would have us believe just a few short weeks ago, couldn’t do that. So much for all those “unnamed sources” and their unconfirmed bullshit that even Dan Rather (shame on him) ate up like it was candy!

Meanwhile, in other “suck it, haters” news, check out Atilio Borón’s firsthand impressions of the very healthy president. And when you’re done that, check out Lula’s vote of confidence, and these many reasons why Chavecito has such a healthy lead over Majunche — sorry, that little putschist putz, Henrique Capriles Radonski — in the polls. And why Majunche, despite his (and the whore media’s) efforts to portray himself as the younger, more vigorous one, isn’t going anywhere. People still remember what he did during the coup of ’02, after all.

“Constitutional” coup d’état in Paraguay. Film at 11.

Sorry, folks, no Festive Left Friday entry this week. Your Aunt Bina is feeling more restive than festive tonight, because the shit has officially hit the fan in a certain landlocked South American country, famous for its maté and its wild and crazy soccer fans…and a certain popular leftist president who used to be a Catholic bishop, and who’s now in the fight of his political life:

The president of Paraguay, Fernando Lugo, announced that he will not resign, and that he will submit to a political trial, but asked for guarantees of a just and legitimate defence. He denounced that the will of the people “is being subjected to a pitiless attack” by sectors opposed to social change.

Everything appears to indicate that determined sectors intend to interrupt a historical democratic process just nine months shy of the next general elections, which are to take place on April 21, 2013.

The president was accused by the Chamber of Deputies of governing in a manner “inappropriate, negligent and irresponsible”, in a charge which seeks his dismissal, presented before the Senate.

The charge refers to the killing of 11 peasants and 6 police officers in an armed confrontation last Friday in Curuguaty, 250 northeast of the Paraguayan capital of Asunción, during the crackdown against an occupation of a ranch. The accusation also calls the Montevideo Protocol on Commitment to Democracy in Mercosur, popularly known as Ushuaia II, and signed by the four presidents of the Mercosur countries, Lugo among them, in the capital of Uruguay in December 2011, an “attack against the sovereignty of the Republic of Paraguay”.

The Ushuaia II protocol stipulates that “it shall be applied in the event of a rupture or menace to democratic order, a violation of constitutional order, or any situation that endangers the legitimate exercixe of power and the exercise of democratic principles”.

The charge against Lugo states that Ushuaia II has “the malicious purpose of obtaining a supposed support in its shameless march against the institutionality and the democratic processes of the Republic”, according to deputy Gustavo Cárdenas, who read out the accusation.

A mission of representatives of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) will be present in Lugo’s political trial, with the objective of guaranteeing that the rules of democratic order will be followed.

The general secretary of UNASUR, Alí Rodríguez Araque of Venezuela, indicated in declarations to the media that “the decisions of the country (Paraguay) will be respected, because they are decisions of a sovereign nature.”

However, he warned that “once the process is over, we will give an opinion”.

Meanwhile, in declarations broadcast by Telesur, the presidents of Colombia and Ecuador gave their viewpoints.

“We will defend democracy, democratic principles and sovereign will, and this position is fixed, concrete, and non-negotiable,” said the Colombian, Juan Manuel Santos.

Rafael Correa (of Ecuador) said that “the measure of a political trial is legal”, but called the political basis of it “illegitimate”.

For his part, the president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, assured that in Paraguay, “a coup d’état is brewing”.

Translation mine.

Well, of course, Evo would say that, wouldn’t he? After all, he’s been the target of some pretty underhanded shit in Bolivia, when a certain balkanizing US “diplomat” (note the quotes) tried to foment a coup there, unsuccessfully trying to pit the so-called “Media Luna” (Half-Moon) of opposition provinces against the government in La Paz. There was even a foiled assassination plot in Santa Cruz, in which the assassins came out on the shit end of the stick. So Evo knows what a coup smells like from personal experience, and has little problem saying as much in regard to his neighbor-friend and Paraguayan counterpart, Lugo.

And similar things can also be said of El Ecuadorable, who also survived a coup attempt in the guise of a so-called police revolt, a lie which I debunked here two years ago. So he too would know shit when he smells it, and has no problem saying as much.

But what about UNASUR as a whole? What’s up with them? Well, how about this:

Ministers of the 12 member states of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and the general secretary of the organization arrived in Asunción and immediately headed for the presidential residence, where they met with president Fernando Lugo, who will stand a political trial before the Paraguayan Congress.

The president stated that the decision of the Congress to place him on trial “is an express coup d’état” and blamed it on businessman Horacio Cartes, a presidential precandidate for the Colorado Party.

The diplomatic chiefs of Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, Paraguay’s partners in Mercosur, as well as those of Venezuela, Chile and Peru, were already present at the presidential residence in Asunción, and are currently awaiting the arrival of María Angela Holguín from Colombia, according to an official Paraguayan spokesperson.

At the meeting as well, was the general secretary of UNASUR, Alí Rodríguez of Venezuela.

The press was allowed access to film the meeting, in which various Paraguayan political leaders and the team of Lugo’s judicial advisors were also present.

The Paraguayan Congress decided today, and hours later initiated a judicial process against Lugo, who is accused of abuse of powers, among other things, over a confrontation between police and peasants which left 17 dead, during an eviction of landless peasants occupying a hacienda in Curuguaty on June 15.

[...]

Lugo maintains that the coup d’état was orchestrated on Wednesday night and early Thursday, during which time the parliamentarians agreed to stage a political trial without “a valid reason”. He blamed Cartes and conservative forces of the right as authors of the trial, which he called unconstitutional, with no respect for due process.

Translation mine.

Here we get a little more backgrounder, and it becomes clear that this is a politically motivated “trial” (note the quotes, kiddies, it’s becoming increasingly obvious that we need to put that word in ‘em. I do not think it means what the Paraguayan rightards think it means!)

In particular, I think we need to watch the movements of this Horacio Cartes fellow much more closely, since it’s he who started the proceedings, and he has clear political motivations for doing so. He cannot be called a disinterested democrat who cares much for the lives of campesinos OR the police. He’s a precandidate for the old Stroessner-era right-wing party, the Colorados, and it’s obvious that they want back what they think is rightfully theirs — namely, the presidency itself. This is a long-entrenched oligarchy we’re talking about here, folks. Democracy isn’t high on their list of priorities; after all, they’re the party of the old fascist dictator of Paraguay. Whereas Lugo, a popular democrat, actually ran for office because he was urged to do so by the people, and even gave up his position as a bishop for their sake. And, as a friend and ally of the most popular, progressive presidents in Latin America — most significantly Chavecito, Evo and El Ec — he was in a fair position to actually start implementing some real democratic reforms in Paraguay, on the model of those three countries, who have all improved their socioeconomic standings dramatically in co-operation with each other and with Cuba, through the ALBA.

This, then, is the basis of all those hogwash charges against Lugo. It’s very unlike the man popularly known as the People’s Bishop to turn the police in fascist style against, of all people, a bunch of poor campesinos looking for land and occupying a ranch in some godforsaken bumfuck outpost in northeastern Paraguay. Remember, this is the man whose political base is those same poor folks, whom he served tirelessly as both bishop and president. It stinks to high heaven that he should be charged with the crimes he is accused of…crimes which are, in fact, MUCH more in character for his Colorado opponents than they are for Lugo himself. And which I venture to predict will turn out to have been ordered by those same opponents, very conveniently, given the suspicious timing of this whole kangaroo court charade.

Lugo is being very brave here, maintaining his post while undergoing trial; it’s the mark of a man who is confident that he will be found innocent. That speaks well for him, and bodes ill for his enemies.

Watch this space, kiddies, it is gonna heat up fast here. And don’t forget what I told you about who really ordered that disastrous raid.

PS: Courtesy of my good friend Otto, FUCK.

PPS: OMG, would you look at the headlines at Contrainjerencia!

“Cristina: ‘Argentina won’t validate the coup in Paraguay’”

“Ecuador will not recognize the president imposed by the Congress of Paraguay”

“President Chávez: Venezuela will not recognize new government of Paraguay”

“Dilma proposes ‘the expulsion of Paraguay from Mercosur and UNASUR’”

There’s more…LOTS more. I’m gonna be busy translating these next few days, I can see that.

And if the putschists thought that they’d have an easy time of it, voting Lugo out almost unanimously, now they’re going to see that their shit has consequences. HEAVY ones. That one about Dilma is especially satisfying. When even Brazil is proposing economic sanctions and political isolation against a country as poor and stunted as Paraguay, you know LatAm fascism is no longer the cakewalk it used to be.