What happens when local news gets decimated

When local channels are no longer locally run, but just part of some big corporate conglomerate, bad things happen. Bad things like this:

CHCH’s vice-president of news Mike Katrycz said he believes the station ultimately aired around a minute of “hardcore pornography.”

“But as I say, it seemed like an eternity,” he said in a telephone interview Friday.

Katrycz said he noticed the issue right away and frantically called the network’s master control to try to fix it. But since the problem originated elsewhere, they weren’t able to immediately pull the material off the air.

“It was out of our hands,” he said.

CHCH is — or WAS — a locally owned/operated station in Hamilton. It’s now being run out of Toronto by a conglomerate called Channel Zero. Sounds very faceless and anonymous, and no doubt it is. There’s no more local content, outside of the news, and even that has been suffering in the name of maximized profit and minimized cost.

And if the viewer reactions are any indication, it’s gonna be suffering a lot more:

“Just eating some pancakes this morning watching .CHCH … I no longer like pancakes or the news,” wrote Twitter user (at)derek1913.

Others weren’t quite so amused.

One woman, who said she was angry, tweeted that it was lucky no small children were in the room when the pornography came on.

Apparently, no one was paying attention at the controls, either. And no wonder, since porn literally shuts down the brain.

See, kiddies, this is what happens when corporate honchos get greedy. Even local news isn’t local anymore when some jerkoff is wanking at the switch.

And it isn’t news, either.

Festive Left Friday Blogging: We can haz new proggregator?

Yes, we can haz.

And this is terrific news, since teh illiberalz eated the old one.

I’m still waiting for the bumper sticker (and the typo in the banner to be fixed), so I can add it to my sidebar for further prettification. Muchas gracias to the always-awesome Pale of A Creative Revolution for making it happen.

See you there!

Canada’s gift

It’s been thirty years this week since Pierre Trudeau brought our Constitution over from England, and appended our Charter of Rights and Freedoms to it. Cause for celebration? Definitely, and especially in light of this:

“Could it be that Canada has surpassed or even supplanted the United States as a leading global exporter of constitutional law? The data suggest that the answer may be yes.” So conclude two U.S. law professors whose analysis of the declining influence of the American constitution on other nations will be published in New York University Law Review in June.

As the first Commonwealth nation to adopt a bill of rights, Canada has influenced other former British colonies as they create or revise their own constitutions, the study finds. Israel, Hong Kong and Eastern European countries have also drawn from the Canadian example.

Both the Charter itself and the nation that gave birth to it serve as an example to the world. “Some countries may be especially prone to borrow from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because they perceive themselves as sharing the same goals and values as Canadian society,” write David S. Law, who is professor of law at Washington University in St. Louis, and Mila Versteeg, who teaches law at University of Virginia.

In contrast, professors Law and Versteeg conclude that the American constitution, once the foundational document for new nations in search of a government, has fallen out of favour. It fails to protect rights, such as freedom from discrimination based on race or sex, that are considered fundamental in our time; it enshrines rights, such as the right to bear arms, that other nations don’t value; its courts increasingly interpret the American document so perversely – by claiming that it must only be applied as the founding fathers originally intended – as to render it useless as a tool for tackling modern problems.

Bam! Suck on that, con-tards. While you’re so busy bitching about our so-called lack of cultural identity (which, by the way, is a figment of your limited imaginations!), and admiring the yanks and their Second Amendment, which was written in the days of muskets and blunderbusses (and seems to be most in favor with people as primitive and unreliable as those same), other countries are busy emulating us on the very progressive grounds you despise the most. Namely, those of our much more flexible constitution.

And more to the point, there are a lot more of those countries. And you want to know what they love most about us? The fact that we’re NOT the US:

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms not only prohibits discrimination based on race or gender, it protects mobility and language rights and enshrines the presumption of innocence. It balances the rights of legislatures and courts through the “notwithstanding” clause, which gives the federal and provincial parliaments limited powers to override court decisions.

Beyond the Charter itself, the Canadian Supreme Court is considered an exemplar in balancing constitutional and legislative powers, a role the American Supreme Court lost entirely after Republicans and Democrats turned it into an ideological battleground.

“The Charter is widely admired, and so are the decisions of the Canadian court,” observes Peter Hogg, one of Canada’s foremost constitutional authorities. “And one reason is that Canada is not the United States.”

The U.S. study, which offers a meticulous comparison of how constitutions around the world reflect and influence each other, leads the authors to conclude that “other common-law countries are looking either directly or indirectly at the Charter,” as they draft and amend their own constitutions, Prof. Law explained in an interview Sunday.

“Overall, the evolution of global constitutionalism has tilted more toward the mild-mannered country to the north than its superpower neighbour to the south,” the report concludes.

And the reason for that is our progressive, socially liberal democracy. Which the Charter has helped us to build. Its drafting was a non-partisan affair, with members of all three major parties contributing. Which means that it rightly belongs to us all.

And that’s just what pisses off Harpo, who would like nothing better than to see his not-so-new Conservative party owning our country in perpetuity. Little wonder, then, that he is so petulant as not to be celebrating this milestone.

Tough toenails, Harpo. Canada is a progressive country still. And it will go on being one in spite of your efforts to make it over in your own regressive, repressive image. It will still be one long after you are dead and gone. Our progressive base is too strong to be snuffed out by you or anyone.

I guess it’s asking too much to tell you to stuff your spite and get over yourself. Doesn’t matter; the rest of us are quite content to celebrate this cornerstone of our national identity…without you and yours.

Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Cool Beans, Law-Law Land. Comments Off »

Harpo go home! (and smarten the fuck up already)

First, a little music to set the mood:

Ah, that was lovely. Now, the story:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his wife Laureen were awakened by a major earthquake as they overnighted in Chile’s capital of Santiago.

Buildings shook throughout the city at around 12:50 a.m. local time in what the United State Geological Study rated as a 6.5 earthquake centred 112 kilometres from the city.

Harper’s director of communications, Andrew MacDougall, said the prime minister and his wife remained in their rooms and were fine.

Still, the event shook up the media and delegation travelling with Harper who were wrapping up a four-day trip to Colombia and South America.

It shook up the media, but no word on what it did to ShitHead. Probably nothing. Maybe because he’s a robot?

Meawhile, on a related note, we have this:

Two separate studies are providing insights into the earth-shaking consequences of the controversial gas extraction process known as fracking.

Both studies confirm that hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, can trigger manmade earthquakes when water, sand and chemicals are blasted deep into the ground to fracture rock to obtain oil and natural gas.

Energy companies are increasingly using the technique across Canada, including in B.C. where there is already regular seismic activity and an ever looming threat of various sized tremors.

The U.S. Geological Survey is set to release its findings Wednesday that a “remarkable” increase of quakes in the U.S. midcontinent since 2001 is “almost certainly” the result of oil and gas production.

And also, disgustingly, this:

The federal government will limit the ability of environmental groups to intervene in reviews of major resource projects, as it moves to speed up approvals for pipelines and other resource projects.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said Tuesday that Ottawa will soon table legislation that will reduce the number of projects that undergo federal environmental assessment by exempting smaller developments completely and by handing over many large ones to the provinces.

Mr. Oliver said the government will also bring in new measures to prevent project opponents from delaying the assessment process by flooding hearings with individuals who wish to speak against the development.

The Conservative government was dismayed when the National Energy Board extended its hearings on the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, which would carry oil-sands bitumen to the British Columbia coast for export to Asia by super-tanker. The regulator was responding to requests from more than 4,000 individuals to give oral testimony at hearings now under way.

After railing for months against radical environmentalists bent on blocking resource development, the Natural Resources Minister signaled Tuesday the government will cut them out of the assessment process unless they can prove they would be directly affected by the project.

Hmmmmm. You don’t suppose FRACKING projects could be among those, do you?

And if an earthquake in the Andean nation of Chile can’t shake Harpo’s complacency about THAT, nothing can. And that should worry us all.

This house is clear!

Can you feel that, buddy? Huh? Huh?? Huh???

I have exorcised the demons!

Well, actually, my BFF did it. Saved my luddite ass, as usual. He’s the one who helped me get rid of the odious bumper sticker of Those Who Shall Henceforth Remain Nameless. Thanks, Ben!

Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Technical Notes. Comments Off »

It’s shit like this…

…that confirms to me that the Progressive Bloggers aggregator has aggregated just a little too much unprogressive gunk. Or, as Pale would put it, they were so open-minded that their brains leaked out. And this is what took the place of all that grey matter. Crud. Curt, short, and rude.

So much for reasoned debate, eh Scott?

See, this is what happens when you let the anti-choicers (who are anti-progressive and thus, anti-awesome) try to tell you what “reasonable” is. You get crap everywhere.

But hey! It’s so nice to see that the so-called Prog Blog has decided to come out on the side of the Women’s Moderation Movement.

You know what that is?

Well, I’ll give you a hint. It’s not a real movement.

Women’s Moderation, as distinct from Women’s Liberation, is nothing but appeasement and compromise. It’s what we women have been doing forever. Some of us did it out of the foolish notion that it would get us somewhere if only we said pretty-please with enough sugar on it; all of us did it because it was not as though we were being given any real choice in the matter, anyway. We compromised, we appeased, we grovelled. And it never got us anywhere. Whenever one of our oppressors told us to jump, we didn’t ask any questions, other than (timidly) How high? And whenever one of our abusers hit us, we rolled over. Sometimes we played dead; sometimes, we WERE dead.

And any which way you slice it, we were not free.

And we were not making progress, either. Which is kind of the whole point of being progressive, isn’t it?

Yeah, that’s what Women’s Moderation gets you: It gets you nothing, except maybe sometimes when it gets you dead. Sound reasonable to you, ladies?

Didn’t think so.

But apparently the Powers That Be at the Not-So-Progressive Bloggers have decided that it IS reasonable to let the enemies of progress get a foot in the door. And it’s not the first time they’ve done that, either. We’ve seen anti-green energy blogs, “red” Tory blogs, and now this. Liberalism so illiberal that it is virtually indistinguishable from the not-at-all-progressive-anymore Conservative Party. Lots and lots of crap gets caught in that aggregator, and yet no one ever cleans it out. Meanwhile, the smell…

Is it any wonder all the real progressives are fleeing? Is it any wonder I wanted out?

Well, now I’m out. And the air is smelling cleaner already.

Now, if someone would kindly lend me a windshield scraper so I can get their deceptive bumper sticker off my sidebar, I’ll be all set.

Thanks, real progressives, for sticking with me…and let’s keep on truckin’.

PS: Just had to share this. It’s perfect:

Who needs an editor? Not Fidel…

…but the unnamed snotball who wrote this for the Canadian Press? Oh yes.

Look, CP presstitute-person, whoever you are, hiding behind your tradition of unsigned editorial cowardice…I understand that you may not like Fidel Castro, but it’s still a fact that he is FAR more popular in all the Americas than Harpo is up here. And the reason for his popularity, not that it matters to the likes of you, is simple: He has kept mafias and monopolies from dominating Cuba. In other words, he stands for Cuban sovereignty. Or, to put it another way: He kicks Stephen Harper’s sweater-vested ass.

Obviously our silly scribes up here in the no-longer-so-great North have no idea how popular the Cuban Revolution actually still is. They seem to think that it was only popular for the time it took to drive out Fulgencio Batista. And that once Fidel revealed himself to be a Marxist-Leninist, it all went downhill.

WRONG.

There is a reason why Fidel lived to retire as president, rather than being killed or forced to flee like any other dictator. And that is the fact that he remains popular. He kept all his promises from the outset of the revolution, starting with land reform; he made sure that his own family’s hacienda was among the first to be nationalized. Of course that didn’t sit well with his mother, who probably had been counting on her sons’ taking up the family tradition of land-owning aristocracy, but…oh, well. Fidel and Raúl, and all their fellow barbudos, made good on their promises to the point of living up to them personally, which is why there is still so little opposition to them today. Had they gone the route of their Russian counterparts, who made a big point of calling each other “comrade” while owning luxurious dachas in the best parts of the country, Cuba too would probably have fallen to predatory capitalism after the Berlin Wall came down.

Instead, Cuba weathered even the worst, the so-called Special Period. Cuban cars are still running, decades after their US counterparts were all either junked or enshrined in automotive museums. Cuban gardeners grow fresh organic vegetables in communal gardens, even in downtown Havana. Cuban pharmaceutical plants, even without massive foreign capital investment, are turning out drugs that work; a recently developed anti-cancer injection, derived from the venom of a native species of scorpion, enjoys such high regard that people are coming from as far away as Italy to receive it. And Cuban medical schools are training doctors from all over the Americas, for careers that will take them not to lucrative private practice, but to helping the sick who need them most. And those can be found in the poorest parts of Latin America, not to mention the ghettos of the United States and…dare we say it? Yes, we do…the native reserves of Canada.

Meanwhile, Cuban educators are teaching people all over Latin America to read and write; Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador have now joined Cuba in being declared free of illiteracy by the UN. It would appear that the Cuban literacy program, developed during the revolution by Fidel’s band of barbudos even during the fighting in the Sierra Maestra, has paid dividends!

Canada and the US do not enjoy such distinction. It seems that our politicians are more interested in starving the public systems of funding than they are of making sure that we occupy a real place of pride in the world. It is as if they were actively conspiring to make sure that the corporations own and enslave us all, and that we learn only how to adapt to that, and not to think for ourselves.

That is most emphatically NOT the case with Cuba.

Cuban schoolchildren learn to analyze world events in a way that would bring tears to the eyes of any social-studies teacher up here. They are certainly not cut off through dictatorship or communist propaganda. They do in fact receive news of current events from the outside world, and what I have read in the Cuban media convinces me that it is honest, accurate and uncensored. The only thing lacking there is money, and this is not because of Fidel and his bullheaded adherence to Marxism; it’s because of the US and its bullshit adherence to its economic blockade. Not for nothing does Fidel draw the distinction between them and us; remember, Canada has always had normal relations with Cuba. Canadians have been able to travel there freely when US citizens were actively forbidden by their own government…or when that same government sent them there to spy, and to try to spark a counter-revolution. We all know how well THAT has turned out so far: 638 failed assassination attempts against Fidel. A Guinness world record!

Meanwhile, Fidel remains alive, retired, but still writing. And thumbing his nose merrily at it all.

And now our lovely corporate media is also touting the stupid party line from south of our border. Even the supposedly fair and impartial CP has gotten in on the game; shameful.

Unlike Fidel, I don’t have the time or the space here to give them a more thorough history lesson. Or the inclination, really. All I can do is suggest that they start by reading Che Guevara’s Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War; they might then start to get an inkling. They might also want to watch Steven Soderbergh’s two-part film on the life of Che; it’s a well-wrought and mostly faithful rendering of the actual events. (I have to say, though, that I feel bad for any actor who’s ever played Che; not only was the original much handsomer, he also had far better lines.)

And above all, the CP needs to start hiring fact-checkers again. It’s really fucking embarrassing when a little blogger like me has to school them on the very basics.

Or, for that matter, to remind them to keep a civil tongue in their heads.

Dear Harper Government™: Fuck You. Love, Quebec.

And thanks so much for forgetting the Montréal Massacre, too. It only took you bastards 23 years to set us collectively back half a century. Bray-fucking-vo. Meanwhile, les Québécois(es) se souviennent:

On a day the government fulfilled a long-standing goal and saw legislation to destroy the federal long-gun registry set to receive royal assent, it was stymied in a Quebec courtroom.

Quebec Superior Court stepped in and ordered a delay in the deletion of registry data from that province, following a request by the provincial government.

The court has granted the reprieve until further motions for an injunction can be argued in a Montreal courtroom next week, as the Quebec-Ottawa registry fight moves to its next phase. The province wants to keep the data for Quebec so that it can set up its own provincial registry.

In the interim, the registry will continue to function in Quebec — long arms will continue to be registered and the information will be kept for now.

“For the moment, it’s the status quo that is maintained. The information will continued to be registered,” said Quebec government lawyer Eric Dufour.

“The information will be continued to be amassed for an eventual provincial database.”

Vive la Belle Province! (And could you PLEASE liberate the rest of us from these woman-hating hacks?)

PS: And a special fuck-you to John Fucking Williamson. Using the words of a GUNSHOT MURDER VICTIM to celebrate the untrammelled right to murder weapons? Welcome to my wankapedia, you quote-twisting dirty fucking BASTARD.

I’ll just leave this right here

Apparently this is the poster for a cancer-research benefit match. And yes, that is Justin “Just Watch Me” Trudeau in the upper right-hand corner! I could make all kinds of naughty puns about this, but I think I’ll just say that all this beefcake has done wonders for my red blood cell count.

Posted in Canadian Counterpunch. Comments Off »

The poutine thickens.

And look! There’s a Spanish fly in it:

RackNine, the Edmonton company that suspect “Pierre Poutine” used to send voters to the wrong polling locations, is operated by Edmonton businessman Matt Meier, with the help of Rick McKnight, who is identified variously as head of marketing and web developer.

But Postmedia News was unable to find anyone who knows McKnight, even though he has a healthy online identity, including 551 Facebook friends, many of them prominent.

Meier and his lawyer declined earlier this week to clear up the case, but citing the RackNine boss, the Globe and Mail identified the mysterious McKnight as Rafael Martinez Minuesa, a Spaniard, who uses the name Rick McKnight in his work for the company.

And now everyone is wondering, I’m sure, what I am wondering: Why would a Spaniard working for a Canadian company feel compelled to anglicize his name and disguise his identity? Canada isn’t exactly a melting-pot country; there’s none of the pressure to conform to WASP standards here that there is in the US. So, Rafael, ¿qué pasa? And since when do Spaniards eat poutine?