Stupid Sex(ist) Tricks: How to smell like a pelotudo

Everybody in North America knows (or SHOULD know) that Axe Body Spray is the masking odor for (pre)adolescent male sexual insecurity, immaturity and general lack of appeal. It’s the sort of stuff that you want to avoid if you’re a guy, and avoid a guy who smells of it if you’re a gal. So when I saw this bit of badvertising on Gawker, I could only guffaw at what lies in store for poor, unsuspecting Argentina:

Gawker supplies the following translation, so I won’t bother with my own:

Last September 24th it was Boyfriend’s Day.

What does Axe have to say to boyfriends?

Hey, dude. There’s nothing to celebrate.

We know you want to be with all of them, except with the one you’re with.

That’s why we set up some secret installation in the men’s room,

And gave them 5 minutes of singledom.

Welcome to the Axe Strip Toilette.

This is just a way of reminding guys that they are “castrating themselves” [Ed. note: Down here when you say a guy is "castrated," it means he only does what his girlfriend/wife says.]

…limiting the power of the Axe effect to just one girl.”

Girl: What took you so long?
Guy: The restroom was a mess.
Girl: Oh, sorry to hear that.

A commenter adds even more elucidation:

Oh man, the best part was lost in translation…

“Girl: What took you so long?
Guy: The restroom was a mess.
Girl: Oh, sorry to hear that.”

So…in Argentina “quilombo” means “whorehouse” in addition to meaning “a mess.” So when the guy at the end says to his girlfriend, “el baño era un quilombo,” he’s saying “whorehouse” and she’s hearing “a mess.”

Which of course assumes that Argentine ladies just naturally gravitate to the more prudish meaning of the slang term. Because they’re genteel, gullible ladies, and all that. The kind who’d never suspect that the bathroom is actually a bordello, where their “uncastrated” man can revel in his five minutes of glorious unattachedness, courtesy of Axe.

And, poor chicas, they will find the stink of Axe (now available in Puto, Pitiyanki Disociado, Pelotudo de Mierda, and ¡Ponte un Condón, Mojón! scents) irresistible. And the wearer likewise? So much so that even if their profession entails never giving a man the time of day unless he pays them first, they’ll still crawl all over him for nada?

Uh, yeah. Riiiiiiiiiiight.

Anyway, compañeras, I’m not sure if you have a literal term in Argentino for “douchebag”, but if in the near future you smell a guy who reeks of horrible cheap cologne and struts around thinking he’s God’s gift, you’ll surely want to share it with me here, no? After you’re done gagging and vomiting in your own mercifully not-Axe-scented bathroom, that is?

The True Story of Che Guevara

Festive Left Friday Blogging: LOLChe

The Herrera case: Negative results in the first round of testing


One chapter ends and another begins in the ongoing mystery of baby-theft and illicit adoptions in Argentina. This one, unfortunately, offers no easy answers for the time being:

The DNA tests recently performed on the Noble Herrera siblings, the adopted children of the president of the Clarín media group, Ernestina Herrera de Noble, did not match those they were compared against by the National Genetic Data Bank; a fact which demonstrates at least that of the genetic branches selected, the youngsters are not related to those particular disappeared persons from the last dictatorship.

[...]

After these preliminary results, a second round of testing will take place, which will consist of a comparison of Marcela and Felipe’s genetic material with all the profiles in the National Genetic Data Bank (BNDG), as requested by the organization of the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo.

However, by request of Belén Cardozo, current director of the BNDG, the second round should be suspended, because Judge Arroyo Salgado had ordered the comparison of the samples against those of all persons born in 1976 (the year in which Marcela and Felipe were born) and, though they are registered in the BNDG, it is not possible to determine which individuals correspond to that date.

Judge Arroyo Salgado had ordered to testing in various phases. The first was completed upon comparison of the samples with those given by two plaintiff families, the Lanoscou-Mirandas and the Gualdero-Garcías.

These DNA comparisons gave negative results, and for that reason, the magistrate ruled that later in the week, more DNA comparisons would follow, this time for all families of kidnap victims of the dictatorship in the years 1975 and 1976, and who are searching for babies born in clandestine detention centres in those years. This would be the second step of the procedure of DNA comparison ordered by the magistrate.

[...]

The two adopted children of Ernestina Herrera de Noble, widow of the Clarín media group founder, Roberto Noble, have repeatedly insisted that the DNA testing they were subjected to be compared only to those of the two families who brought suit nine years ago, suspecting that Marcela and Felipe might have been babies stolen from their parents by the military in a clandestine prison.

It was suspected that Herrera de Noble, who supported the military dictatorship, adopted the two possibly-stolen children in 1976, in an irregular manner.

The theft of babies born in prison was a very common practice during the military dictatorship, and is considered a crime against humanity.

Translation mine.

Some might want to let sleeping dogs lie, but that’s been going on far too long in Argentina. The longer the military dictatorship’s crimes against humanity go unaddressed, the longer a deep and corrupting rift within Argentine society will go unhealed. So far, only a fraction of the missing babies have been identified. If these two, whose adoption was indeed suspicious, prove to be among them, it will represent one small step towards the truth in a country where too many have been living a big lie for too long.

Dramatic turnaround in an Argentine adoption case

Marcela and Felipe Noble Herrera arrive to submit DNA samples in compliance with a judicial order. After 10 years of delays and legal wrangling, there will finally be an answer to the question: Are they children of the disappeared?

The adoptive children of the owner of the Argentine daily newspaper, Clarín, presented themselves on Friday at a hospital to give DNA samples, in compliance with a judicial order, in the investigation into whether they are children of disappeared persons of the dictatorship (1976-83).

“After ten years of delays, today they’re complying with the law,” said Alan Iud, one of the attorneys representing the humannitarian group, Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo, a plaintiff in the suit.

Marcela and Felipe Noble Herrera, who were adopted by Ernestina Herrera de Noble (86 years old) when they were infants, in May and July of 1976, respectively, came to the National Genetic Data Bank (BNDG) of Buenos Aires in a car with polarized-glass windows.

The two entered the Durand hospital, where the BNDG operates, surrounded by bodyguards and amid heavy security.

A week ago, the Noble-Herreras unexpectedly declared themselves willing to submit blood, saliva and other DNA samples.

The sudden decision comes after 10 years of legal wrangling, including the detention, in 2003, of their mother, who heads the largest media group in Argentina, for a few hours.

“We have to wait and see (how this develops) because of all the delays and the sudden turnaround,” said Iud.

The complete DNA analysis will take between two and three weeks, he explained.

The decision of the adopted children was announced shortly after the appellate court confirmed a resolution to force them to submit to a blood test, as authorized by law.

“What could happen? Whether they are or not, we never said they were, we said they could be (children of the disappeared) [...] The truth will come out,” said Estela Carlotto, president of the Grandmothers, after appearing at the United Nations in Geneva to present the candidacy of the group for the Nobel Peace Prize of 2011.

The Grandmothers estimate that some 500 sons and daughters of the disappeared were stolen and given for illegal adoption during the dictatorship. Of these, 103 have recovered their true identities.

Some 30,000 persons disappeared during the dictatorship, according to human-rights organizations.

Translation mine.

The timing of these two adoptions could not be more suspicious, coming as they did within the first year of the Argentine junta’s dictatorship. Watch this space, everyone…in a couple of weeks, we’ll finally know for sure what the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo have long wondered or suspected. At the very least, it may finally become known just whose children these two young adults really are.

Ollanta, Evo. Evo, Ollanta.

This is such a nice shot of Ollanta and Evo that I was tempted to save it for Friday. But the story that goes with it is too hot to sit on for three whole days, so here it is:

The president-elect of Peru, Ollanta Humala, said on Tuesday in Bolivia that he dreamed of one homeland, united, as it had been for centuries.

In a speech at a luncheon given by Bolivian president Evo Morales, along with representatives of government ministries, social organizations, the military and the diplomatic corps, the dignitary emphasized that he was talking about a single nation, a single country.

Humala also said that Latin America is changing thanks to its peoples and their new leaders — a continent, he said, with Amazonia, the largest freshwater reserve, but with unequal distribution of these and other natural resources.

In this spirit, Humala called upon Morales to work with him to create economic policies that create more integration, development, and to solve the principal problems of the sectors historically marginalized by previous governments.

Hours before returning to his country, Humala explained that the tour he had begun, which had previously taken him to Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and which will take him in turn to Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela and the United States, is to send a message of unity.

He said of his upcoming inauguration, slated for July 28, that he would only serve the people, and not the economic powers.

Humala criticized previous governments, who forged a state in republican days that only attended to 30 percent of the population and neglected the remaining 70 percent, who remained cut off and marginalized, mostly in rural areas.

He also praised the possibilities of Bolivia, demonstrated at that same luncheon, where indigenous dignitaries sat at the same table as uniformed officers, executive authorities, legislators and diplomats.

For his part, Bolivian president Evo Morales stated that the current successes in Bolivia were the result of the struggles of the social movements, much as would occur in Peru.

Morales wished Humala strength for the hard work ahead, above all against those who would try to derail the changes and transformations to come, as had occurred in Bolivia.

When you serve the people, the bases will defend you, Morales added, and remarked: “With the conscience of the people, we will overcome.”

Translation mine.

Well. So much for those who think Ollanta will be just more of the same for Peru. Unity with Bolivia and other Latin American countries? A more equal distribution of wealth and resources? More integration and inclusion for the marginalized indigenous? This is definitely not another Twobreakfasts García we’re talking about here, kiddies.

And I don’t think he’s going to be another Lula, as the English-language bizmedia have been trying to position him, either. Lula’s most notable failure? Improving things for the landless peasants of Brazil, who’ve been left to carry on their struggles without him (although things ARE looking up now that former guerrilla Dilma Rousseff is at the helm; sign here to help keep a certain pair of feet to the fire). Ollanta is definitely sending the message that he’s going to take his cues from his neighbor, Evo, who has succeeded at the so-called impossible.

And the parallels are hard to miss: A poor, marginalized, largely indigenous majority, set against rule by a minority which is mostly white and all of it rich? The situation of both countries was the same for a long time, until Evo broke with it. Bolivia is now on the verge of exiting the poor-country category and entering a solid middle ground. Pretty impressive for a place that had long been given up as stuck in the Third World!

But here’s no coincidence: 70% of Peruvians were marginalized. Guess what Ollanta’s current approval rating is? The exact same figure. We know who approves of him already: That same excluded majority. Their reasons for approval are varied, but I think they’d probably like it if he were more like Evo. They can’t have missed the evidence that Bolivia is pulling ahead of Peru in many respects.

I don’t believe there will be an actual dissolution of the borders between Bolivia and Peru, but if the latter can take its cues from the former, it will certainly look as if the two are one.

Surreal adventure in an Argentine lake

Who wants to scuba-dive in a weird grey moonscape? This Argentine dude apparently does. The moonscape is Nahuel Huapí, which is normally a nice clear alpine lake in southern Argentina, and it looks like that now because it got a liberal dusting of ash from the recently-erupted Puyehue volcano in neighboring Chile. The same has disrupted air travel in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil with its massive ash cloud, which can clog the engines of jet aircraft and makes visibility extremely poor for pilots. Airlines from as far away as Australia and New Zealand have had to cancel flights because of it, although service is now starting to resume.

I can only imagine what it must be like trying to see through water darkened with a heavy layer of ash. Let’s hope this lake is clearer underneath that surface!

Festive Left Friday Blogging: Happy Birthday Che!

“Don’t keep looking for your brother, they threw him from a helicopter”

Pura Soto Rojas points to a headline: “SHOT”. It refers to the deaths, by secret firing squad, of leftist guerrillas during the “democratic” years of the Fourth Republic. Years which were not so democratic in fact, as the tragic story of her brother Víctor Ramón makes clear:

“Víctor Ramón was born in Altagracia de Orituco (state of Guárico). He was 32 years old when they disappeared him. When they re-opened the Central University of Venezuela (UCV), after closing it during the dictatorship of [Marcos] Pérez Jiménez, he studied sociology. He spent a long time there because he was persecuted as a director of the FCU and of the Revolutionary Left Movement (MIR). Because he was constantly in hiding, he did not finish the semester so that he could graduate in 1963.”

So begins the story told by Pura Soto Rojas, sister of Víctor Ramón Soto Rojas, whose name appears on a list of at least 1,000 persons who disappeared during the era of the “Fourth Republic” (1958-1998), a period which will be the object of a special investigation to punish the crimes of the state in the name of a crusade against the left, as soon as the “Law Against Forgetting” is passed.

It is said that Víctor Ramón — brother of the current president of the Venezuelan National Assembly, Fernando Soto Rojas — disappeared on July 27, 1964, because that was the day on which military forces of the government of Raúl Leoni detained him, due to his militancy in the MIR.

* * *

How do you remember the day on which he disappeared?

In June of ’64, Ramón went to give a political-education workshop to the guerrillas of the Ezequiel Zamora Front, on the mountain El Bachiller (on the border of the states of Miranda, Guárico and Anzoátegui). Weeks later, there was a bombing, and while fleeing, he came out on the road along with Trino Barrios, and that’s when they arrested him.

They informed my sister that they had taken him to San Juan de los Morros (Guárico), to the National Guard post commanded by Genarino Peña Peña. They told her that they gave my brother a mock shooting and then transferred him to the National Guard in El Paraíso, Caracas.

When we arrived in El Paraíso, we met with a friend, a lieutenant who told me: “He was here, but the Digepol (General Directorate of Police) took him because he was a prisoner of theirs. Go away quickly, move, Pura, move!” he told us.

Was it a bad sign that he was taken by the Digepol?

Yes! Everyone knew about the tortures in the Digepol centre at Las Brisas (Caracas). There they told us that yes, he was detained, but they were interrogating him. That was on a Thursday. They told us: “Come back on Sunday, he’s already got visitors.” We did, but he was already gone. A friend from COPEI who was there told us: “Hurry because they took him out yesterday, very tortured, to Cúpira (Miranda).” I started to yell “Murderers! They killed my brother! Murderers!” I remember that the lawyer who was with us told my mother: “Rosa, you’d better not bring Pura along anymore, because they’ll rape her on you.”

That’s when my mother’s torment began. We went to Cúpira on Monday, to the Operations Centre. “We don’t have any detainees here,” they told us, but Mama always thought he was there because all the soldiers looked at her face when she said she had come looking for Ramón. They told us he was in Barcelona (Anzoátegui). We went, and found nothing. Later, they told us Maracaibo (Zulia) — not there, either. In El Dorado, lies. Wherever they said, my mama went.

It was a case that made big noise in the press. Mama went everywhere, even to the International Red Cross, and no one came, not the OAS, not the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no one. My mother was only looking for her son, right up to the end. She died at 102 years of age. She said: “Damn it, I’m going to go, and I won’t have anywhere to bring a rose to my son.” Every September 26, on Ramón’s birthday, she would say: “Today he’s this many years old.”

How did you find out about the helicopter?

I was studying psychology at the UCV. One day, a soldier came to the FCU looking for me. We were sitting on a bench, and he told me: “Look, don’t go on searching for your brother, they took him to the encampment of San José de Guaribe (Guárico), they tortured him a lot. I put a pair of Bermuda shorts on him, and they took him up in a helicopter with Lt. Tomás Rojas Grafe. When the helicopter came back, the detainee was not on board.” The pilot said, “You can’t do that, how can you throw a live person from a helicopter?” and Rojas Grafe replied: “Shut up, or the same thing will happen to you.”

Years later, I saw in the news the case of the “monster of Mamera” (1980), the crime of the Metropolitan Police officer Ledezma, and it looked to me like the face of the same soldier. They told me that when he was a prisoner, he said he knew of the Soto Rojas case, where a man was thrown from a helicopter.

And did anyone ever confirm that?

There was a soldier, Herber Faull, who said that they ordered him to look into the helicopter story, and he said that the body of my brother had smashed into a very large ceiba tree near Guatopo (Guárico). That they lowered and lifted him from the helicopter to force him to talk, and at one point they hit him against the tree. That’s the latest version we’ve heard, about six years ago. We never told Mama. Why?

That was what happened, remember that they used that method a lot in Vietnam, that’s where they also implemented it. It was an era of state terrorism, the government was aware of all this barbarity. It was horrible. There were raids all the time, in the night, they destroyed everything, and it wasn’t a dictatorship, no, it was a democracy!

We lived with our guarantees [of freedom] suspended all the time, with curfews, with Rómulo Betancourt [as president] it happened all the time.

Whom did they raid? Guerrillas’ families?

No! It was everyone on the left, you couldn’t be a leftist, it was prohibited. Either you were an Adeco or a Copeyano, and if they didn’t disappear you, there were still thousands executed by firing squad and disappeared. So many campesinos died in bombing raids, accused of aiding the guerrillas.

Look, the mother of Gabriel Puerta Aponte, the leader of the Red Flag faction, lived in the building next door. They raided her home all the time. She’s dead now. I always asked myself how she would feel seeing her son today, allied to their own executioners.*

How did you resign yourselves? How did you stop searching for Ramón?

We lost and regained hope over a long period of time. We went into mourning and came out of it again. The minister of defence, Florencio Gómez, said one day that they had taken him to do reconnaissance in a guerrilla zone, and that when he tried to flee they invoked the anti-vagrancy law. So my mama said: “Aha, if that’s the case, then give me his body, already!” And the response was, “I don’t know if we can, because it’s in a mountainous area and we don’t know where it is.”

One day, years later, Mama told us she’d had a vision in a church, that she had lifted a military canvas covering and seen him. Then she said, “My son is dead.”

And you?

I think I was the last to resign myself. I always throught: Isn’t that Ramón over there? Wandering around, crazy from all the torture. When I went to Guárico I saw a lot of madmen, and I thought of him. All I know for certain is that we never had a funeral, a grave, nothing. He remains disappeared.

What did your mother think of the political causes of her sons?

Did you know she was in Acción Democrática (AD)? Just like Fernando when he took up politics. But not Ramón, he was in the Communist Party and later he went into the MIR. AD was of the [centre-]left. Mama scolded them when they went with the MIR, and I recall Ramón telling her: “Mama, something very big is going to happen to you when you leave AD.” And Mama said later, when they disappeared him: “Look what my son said. He was right, something big did happen to me.”

Do you believe she passed her ideals along in any way?

I think so. She had revolutionary ideas, she greatly admired Arévalo Cedeño, who was under house arrest during the Gómez dictatorship. She liked his ideas of welfare for the people, even though she never talked of Socialism, she had no idea what it was. She had only a fourth-grade education, but she taught us to share. If anyone came to our house, she would offer food and shelter, and that too is Socialism.

* * *

Pura Soto Rojas is a member of the Front of Friends and Families of the Victims of Crimes of State of the Fourth Republic. This organization promotes the creation of a special law to punish the political murders, executions and disappearances of that period, 1958-1998.

The Truth and Justice Commission will be created as a result of this law, which is to be presented during the next session of the National Assembly, and with it, hundreds of documents from the military and governmental archives will begin to be declassified.

Translation mine.

It has taken a long time for the families of the Venezuelan disappeared to gain recognition for their plight, never mind legal redress. During the Fourth Republic, that vaunted time of freedom and democracy that supposedly disappeared after Hugo Chávez was elected in late 1998, censorship of the news was commonplace, particularly under the governments of Raúl Leoni and Rómulo Betancourt (both of the AD, the party supposedly of the centre-left, which in fact governed Venezuela like a fascist dictatorship). As it was during the 1960s that they reigned, they were early adopters of the same hauntingly awful strategies and tactics later used by the Argentine Junta, as well as Augusto Pinochet in Chile. The same universities that had been shut down under the dictator, Marcos Pérez Jiménez, were also shut down during the “democratic” era of Leoni and Betancourt. The same raids that the political police staged under the dictator, were staged by those same police under the “democrats”. As Yves Montand’s character, a US police chief who trained military and police torturers in Uruguay, says in the movie State of Siege, “Governments come and go, but the police stay.”

And the Digepol, later renamed the DISIP, definitely stayed. Under whatever name, it was very much the repressive organ of a fascist police state. Heads of government changed, but the essential practices of repression did not…until 1998, that is, when they were finally abolished altogether by that evil, repressive, antidemocratic Castro-communist, Chávez. You know, the same one who refuses to censor the press, so that the opposition media can comically crucify itself on a daily basis, screeching that there is no freedom of the press in Venezuela?

How soon they forget. Even under the oh-so-democratic rule of Carlos Andrés Pérez, author of the Caracazo (may he rot in hell), the Venezuelan press was heavily censored. If the publishers did not self-censor, entire news items were left blank by order of the government. Journalists who did not comply faced prison and torture. Some of them, particularly those of the left, were also disappeared. Their stories, too, will likely come out when this bill now before the National Assembly becomes law.

But don’t look for anyone in the opposition media to celebrate that coming triumph of the freedom of information. They’ll probably be too busy reporting on their “political prisoners”, who in fact are politician prisoners, in jail for corruption. And screaming persecution, as always, ad nauseam.

As if THEY knew what political persecution was.

*Bandera Roja, or “Red Flag”, formerly of the left, is now allied in effect with the right-wing anti-Chávez opposition. This passage alludes to their betrayal of everything they used to stand for. The current opposition is the direct descendant of the AD and COPEI of Fourth Republic days — in other words, the same old political ruling class responsible for all the political murders, repressions and disappearances from 1958 to 1998.

Festive Left Friday Blogging: Ollanta Presidente!

My gosh, the dominoes are just tumbling in Latin America, aren’t they? It’s getting so that you’d hardly recognize the place anymore. First it was Venezuela, then Bolivia and Ecuador. Argentina and (for a while) Chile have had some progressive types, too. Brazil is now on its second one. And Paraguay got a “red” ex-bishop, and Uruguay an old Tupamaro. Honduras had a liberal guy who took his cues from the more progressive neighbors to the south, and he scared the shit out of Washington so badly, they had to back a coup to depose him before he rewrote the Honduran constitution on true democratic lines. And now, after a bloated, disastrous term of “investment grade” Twobreakfasts García, look who’s finally in power in Peru:

Yep, he made it. He increased his vote respectably following his loss last time around, and beat out the daughter of a dictator on the second round of balloting this time ’round. That it even went to a second round between those two, of all people, was something surprising for me; I’d have thought Peruvians were so tired of neoliberal neofascism that they’d be electing him in one. Especially since the booming success of Venezuela under Chavecito, who hasn’t been a bit shy about his moral support where Ollanta is concerned. WTF, Peru?

Of course, all the usual voices of unreason have started cranking up already, with the usual belchings of fact-free prose. The CS Monitor, in particular, haz Teh Stoopid in a major way. How the election of a leftist could possibly mark a decline in the Latin American left, I don’t know. Guess they had to spin this in favor of neoliberal bullshit somehow, or the corporatists behind them would scream. Everyone who’s been following Otto (who is not an Ollanta fan himself) even halfway attentively, knows that “investment grade” Peru’s so-called economic growth is a big lie for the most part. My advice is to take whatever Sara Miller Llana says and rotate it 180 degrees if you want to get anywhere near the truth, and then dump a huge truckload of salt on it.

Or better still, read Upside Down World. They’ve also got good analysis from Mark Weisbrot, who notes that in fact, the big losers here were the traditional ruling caste of Peru. Stick THAT in your crack-pipe and smoke it, Sara!

And The Nation is another solid go-to place. They actually report on LatAm leftists without prejudice, and their piece on Ollanta’s win and what it means is must-read analysis. (It’s also very damning of the imperialist interference revealed by Wikileaks. Read it, read it, READ IT!)

Meanwhile, here are my own thoughts:

Plenty of Peruvians, especially in the working classes, are surely hoping Ollanta will, indeed, be the “Peruvian Chávez”. They’re also looking at the changes in neighboring Bolivia and hoping that some of Evo’s hard-won good luck rubs off. They’ve been waiting an awfully long time; at least five years, probably much more. Of course, how much Ollanta will succeed in copying Chavecito’s and Evo’s success depends on how much of the Peruvian parliament he can get behind him. I don’t know what’s up with that.

It would be nice if Ollanta’s Peru could be the next ALBA signatory; it would be especially hopeful for the indigenous peoples, who’ve seen all kinds of terrible (and bloody) setbacks under the overtly racist rule of Alan García, who had no qualms about selling their land right out from under them and even called them “dogs” for daring to protest against that. (None of them are sorry to see HIM go.) But I don’t know whether or when that will happen; again, a lot hinges on the parliament, and it appears to be a house much divided against itself.

Let’s face it, in a country as counterintuitive as Peru is, any victory over imperialism is worth celebrating, however small. I don’t know if Ollanta will exceed expectations or even meet them. But at least he’s not going in there totally friendless and alone; he’ll have support from Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, at the very least. And in any case, he can do no worse than has already been done. He beat out the worst, so it’s worth hoping for the best. I dare to hope he will change Peru for the better, and I look forward to seeing how he does that.

¡Viva Ollanta PRESIDENTE!